Ovaj oglas je prodan.

Pronjuškaj slične oglase.

Cimar (Ibanez) Les Paul, 1978, Dimarzio, kofer

Cijena
491,07 €
Šifra oglasa: 37045862

Osnovne informacije

Lokacija
Srbija
Stanje
rabljeno

Opis oglasa

Kontakt Njuskalo, +381628769450 ili viber +38971596137
Moguca dostava do Zagreba, Ljubljane, Beograda i Skoplja

Cimar 1904S (Ibanez) Les Paul Standard, Japan, Fuji Gen, 1978, sa tvrdim koferom

Bridge Dimarzio DP215FBK Liqui Fire John Petrucci

Neck Dimarzio DP227FBK EVO2 Evolution 2

Odlicno ocuvana

Pragovi odlicni

Prelep sunburst top

Debljina tela 4,5cm, tezina 3.9kg

Video gitare: https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=_kkyNHXdrxU



Cimar was a Japanese brand used by Ibanez for the production of very good copies of American guitars.
In the early 1970s, American guitar manufacturers (particularly Gibson, Fender, and Martin) were experiencing a steady decline in production quality while more Japanese- built guitars were showing up in the American market. By the mid-‘70s, these Japanese guitars consisted of mostly blatant copies of popular American designs and the quality was much better than people wanted to admit. In 1977, Gibson sued the Elger Company (the distributor of Ibanez instruments in the U. S. at the time) and demanded they stop producing copies of their instruments, specifically their headstocks.
An Ibanez Les Paul copy with bolt neck in excellent condition will run you about $500 these days (prices are up, as their reputation is growing). Set neck models run anywhere from $800 and up. These are great clone guitars, even the bolt-neck ones. The "Custom Agent" set-neck models are worth from $1,000-$1,500 (or more for rarer versions/colors) and a set-neck Professional with a vine neck (the "Randy Scruggs" model) will run you $1,500 to $2,500, or even more. There are a few even rarer models that can be worth more than $3,000.
Out of all these Japanese guitar manufacturers who were making absolutely blatant copies of the Gibson Les Paul, it was Ibanez who got sued. You should ask yourself why that would be. I would suggest it was because Ibanez was making a product that was a copy better than the original by Gibson. At least the Ibanez was better than what Gibson was making at the time of the lawsuit.
Ibanez was a guitar manufacturer in transition at the time. They eventually rose as a company to the point at which they had no need for mimicry, and that is where they still are today.



https: //reverb. com/item/48393321-vintage-ca-1978-cimar-ibanez-les-paul-1904s-sunburst-electric-guitar-mij-lawsuit-era-w-ohsc

http: //poldermeester. nl/en/35-leaflets/322-leaflet-cimar-1978

Karta

Audiomak

Svi oglasi ovog oglašivača
Oglas objavljen
14.03.2023. u 08:37
Do isteka još
oglas istekao
Oglas prikazan
2178 puta

Audiomak

Svi oglasi ovog oglašivača